Thomas More Law Center Asks Court To Stop Enforcement Of Individual Mandate Of Health Care


Corrected News Alert

Thomas More Law Center Asks Court to Stop Enforcement of the Individual Mandate of Health Care

April 06, 2010

General - Medical Symbol #1 colorANN ARBOR, MI – In an effort to expedite a U.S. Supreme Court ruling on the constitutionality of the individual mandate provision of the newly enacted health care reform act, today, the Thomas More Law Center (TMLC), a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, filed a motion in Federal District Court for a preliminary injunction, requesting the court to enjoin the enforcement of the individual mandate provision of the law.  [Click here to read Motion & Brief].

Moments after the health care bill was signed into law by President Obama on March 23, 2010, TMLC filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of itself and four Michigan residents who object to being forced by the federal government to purchase health care or face a federal penalty.  The basis for the lawsuit and the motion is that Congress exceeded its authority under the Constitution by mandating that private citizens purchase health care coverage or face a penalty. 

Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel for TMLC, commented, “If Congress can use the Commerce Clause to force people to purchase insurance based on the mere fact that they exist or face federal penalties, then there is no limit to the power of Congress.  Our case is about the constitutional limits of our federal government.  Everyone agrees the health care system needs  reform.  But that doesn’t mean Congress is allowed to violate the Constitution in the process.”

As the Congressional Budget Office noted as early as August 1994, “A mandate requiring all individuals to purchase health insurance would be an unprecedented form of federal action.  The government has never required people to buy any good or service as a condition of lawful residence in the United States.”  As stated in the papers filed this morning in federal court, “The Health Care Reform Act represents an unprecedented encroachment on the liberty of all Americans . . . by imposing unprecedented governmental mandates that restrict their personal and economic freedoms in violation of the Constitution.”

The lawsuit and this motion are being handled by Robert Muise, TMLC Senior Trial Counsel, and David Yerushalmi, an associated private attorney with law offices in New York, Washington D.C., and Arizona.  Under local rules of the court, the government will have 21 days to respond.

The Thomas More Law Center defends and promotes America’s Christian heritage and moral values, including the religious freedom of Christians, time-honored family values, and the sanctity of human life.  It supports a strong national defense and an independent and sovereign United States of America.  The Law Center accomplishes its mission through litigation, education, and related activities.  It does not charge for its services.  The Law Center is supported by contributions from individuals, corporations and foundations, and is recognized by the IRS as a section 501(c)(3) organization.  You may reach the Thomas More Law Center at (734) 827-2001 or visit our website at

What the Law Center is anticipating is the Justice Department will use stall tactics in order to keep the Law Center’s previous lawsuit against the health care bill tied up in the courts long enough for ObamaCare to begin offering benefits.

Once ObamaCare begins to grant benefits it will become much more difficult to repeal as there will then be ‘injured parties’ if the health care bill is overturned.

Thomas More Law Center is attempting to get an injunction to prevent the individual mandates of the bill.  If they are successful, this may force the Justice Department to pursue quicker action in the courts in order to keep the health care bill timeline.

This is a brilliant maneuver if it works 🙂 




2 Responses to Thomas More Law Center Asks Court To Stop Enforcement Of Individual Mandate Of Health Care

  1. Janelle Humbert says:

    Given the number of lawsuits filed, I still have not heard a whisper about the legality of creating a militia answering only to the President. Unless that is a basis for contention in one or more of the Attorneys General who have filed.

    • sirknob says:

      I am not aware of any that have filed on that particular item. However, I am of the opinion that there will be additional lawsuits filed under ObamaCare. One, federal workers that get hit with the Caddy Tax will file suit on the equal protections clause based on the fact they are treated differently under the law as similar federal workers that drafted the law and wrote in exemptions for themselves. Two, active & retired military organizations will sue on breach of contract issues related to promises made and not kept. This, in my opinion, is only the tip of the barrel. There will be dozens, if not dozens of dozens, of suits filed based the lack of equal protections. Muslims for instance are granted religious exemptions, etc… thank for the comments. I hope you have a really great day 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: