Liberal Journalist Wanted Government To Shut Down Fox News

The Daily Caller continues to dribble out interesting bits of information that they have obtained from the recently exposed Liberal Journalist web site list serv Journolist.   This morning they released information that, once again, exposes the Liberal media’s political bias and the length that lame stream media hacks are willing to go in order to prevent the public from hearing fact and truth when it disagrees with their twisted political perspectives.  

“I am genuinely scared” of Fox, wrote Guardian columnist Daniel Davies, because it “shows you that a genuinely shameless and unethical media organisation *cannot* be controlled by any form of peer pressure or self-regulation, and nor can it be successfully cold-shouldered or ostracised. In order to have even a semblance of control, you need a tough legal framework.” Davies, a Brit, frequently argued the United States needed stricter libel laws.

“I agree,” said Michael Scherer of Time Magazine. Roger “Ailes understands that his job is to build a tribal identity, not a news organization. You can’t hurt Fox by saying it gets it wrong, if Ailes just uses the criticism to deepen the tribal identity.”

Jonathan Zasloff, a law professor at UCLA, suggested that the federal government simply yank Fox off the air. “I hate to open this can of worms,” he wrote, “but is there any reason why the FCC couldn’t simply pull their broadcasting permit once it expires?”

And so a debate ensued. Time’s Scherer, who had seemed to express support for increased regulation of Fox, suddenly appeared to have qualms: “Do you really want the political parties/white house picking which media operations are news operations and which are a less respectable hybrid of news and political advocacy?”

But Zasloff stuck to his position. “I think that they are doing that anyway; they leak to whom they want to for political purposes,” he wrote. “If this means that some White House reporters don’t get a press pass for the press secretary’s daily briefing and that this means that they actually have to, you know, do some reporting and analysis instead of repeating press releases, then I’ll take that risk.”

Scherer seemed alarmed. “So we would have press briefings in which only media organizations that are deemed by the briefer to be acceptable are invited to attend?”

John Judis, a senior editor at the New Republic, came down on Zasloff’s side, the side of censorship. “Pre-Fox,” he wrote, “I’d say Scherer’s questions made sense as a question of principle. Now it is only tactical.”

Journolist was/is an online meeting place for liberal journalists to exchange ideas, plan combined attacks on conservatives and discuss which stories should not be reported in order to assure the election of President Obama, or the success of Socialist government initiatives.
Members of Journolist, though they work for the lame stream media, are nothing more than Socialist political hacks.  The paranoia they share with each other in regards to the idea that anyone be allowed to report truth and fact, or report on issues without some type of Liberal damage control, tells you all you need to know about the Liberal media.
Their comparison of the Tea Party to the NAZI brown shirts is quite a stretch considering it is they who are the Socialists that desire the power and control to keep the public dis-informed.  They desire a venue where only they are allowed to speak, yet they call it free.  They desire a venue where others must be silenced if their opinion differs, yet they call it freedom of the press.  They desire a venue where the Liberal Elite are adored and glorified by media, and God help those who dare speak against them, yet they call it equality.  Now, who exactly is it that more resembles the NAZI brown shirts?
This is just further proof of two things I have been saying all along.  First, the Liberal mind is defective and incapable of living in the real World.  Second, the lame stream, government controlled, Socialist media can never be trusted to report the truth.
Liberals are just as dangerous as Radical Islam.  They will take away the rights of others in a heartbeat if it serves their political agenda.  An agenda that will make slaves of everyone but the Socialist Liberal Elite.
Liberals have declared War on Conservatives and Conservatives are finally waking up to the fact.   What really concerns the Liberals is, if the truth be told and the facts come out, that the majority of Americans do not support the Socialist Rule that the Liberals are intent on forcing upon us.
The Garden of Eden has only existed once on this planet.  It was destroyed by the very first liberal.  You know him as Satan.  This idiotic idea, that the Socialist Liberals have, that they can create this Socialist Utopia where everyone is rewarded for no effort, is pure insanity to anyone with common sense.  History proves that Socialism brings nothing but pain and suffering. 
Every time in history, that Socialism has been tried, it has destroyed the population and resulted in the Death of millions.  Another fact the Socialist Liberals do not want anyone to know, because facts and history reveal that they are simply sick minds with a sick agenda, intent on punishing everyone because they can never be happy.  In other words, misery loves company.
When the government controls everything, who controls the government?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: