My Favorite Hymn. Ms Dami Im Sings This Is My Desire
Ms Dami Im – With All I Am
God Bless You Each And Every One
My Favorite Hymn. Ms Dami Im Sings This Is My Desire
Ms Dami Im – With All I Am
God Bless You Each And Every One
Greetings to all friends, visitors, subscribers and hello to all ships at sea
From time to time odd thoughts cross my mind and I find myself dwelling in conspiracy theory. The problem with most conspiracy theories is that the facts, or basis, of theory are seldom facts, or based on sound principles. In other words, most of them are bunk.
In that regard, when I first became concerned with this thought I decided to do a little background, check the possibilities and make sure that I was developing a theory based on principles, reality and this misnomer of them all, dirty politics. Politics, the dirty diaper that makes all things possible. That being said, here we go
Could President Obama simply choose our next president? Yes, he absolutely could. The only wild card being that, Hillary must win the election.
We have heard the President, the head of the department of in-justice and Hillary herself say that Hillary will not be indited in regards to the email scandal. Well, the DOJ did not come right out and say it, she merely heavily hinted that it was not likely to happen. After all, she is an attorney. Cannot expect a straight answer from an attorney without making a cash deposit
Meanwhile, I have it on good intelligence that the FBI is conducting a full investigation into Hillary’s email scandal. They have seized multiple records and evidence from several sources. We are given every reason to believe that the FBI will recommend charges against Hillary and her top aides. Most likely she will be charged for violation of the espionage act, not to mention, pay for play, for giving favorable consideration, by the Dept of State, to those that made donations to the Clinton Foundation.
Will the Department of justice indite Hillary? The answer is no. President Obama will not let them. Just like Lois Lerner, that famous IRS criminal, the Department of in-injustice will simply claim prosecutor’s discretion and not indite. At least not right away. Not until the election is over. Here is why?
Obama has made, or will make, a deal with Hillary. If she will allow Obama to pick her VP running mate, he will assure her that the FBI charges will never see the light of day and that he, himself, will vigorously campaign for, using all his available assets.
Hillary, taking into account that, once she is in office, the Department of in-justice will be forced to do her bidding, and that she can then protect herself, has already, or will soon, agree.
With Obama’s support and assets, her support and assets, and the drive by media backing her up, Hillary will start the election with somewhere near 47% of the vote. She need only convince 4% to 6% of the lower information voters that her opponent, whomever, is pure evil and she will win the election. Finally breaking that final glass ceiling (although we have never actually seen a glass ceiling, people seem to believe it is there somewhere).
Then, just after the election, well, let’s guess December 7th, another day of infamy, the Department of Injustice hands down an indite against Hillary for violation of the espionage act. Boom.
The president, wanting to distance himself, elects to hand the indite over to a special prosecutor outside the authority of the dept of in-justice. The dept of in-justice then hands over all documents and evidence to the special prosecutor. By doing so, Hillary loses all access to the evidence and cannot stop the process once she is ordained into office.
After the coronation, once Hillary makes history as the first female President of the United States, out comes the special prosecutor with all the evidence and charges on public display. Eventually, and it may take six months, Hillary will be forced to resign in order to defend herself.
Then whomever Obama picks as Hillary’s running mate will be the President of the United States.
But, and here is the final rub, Hillary will not face prosecution. Whomever Obama picks to be the next president will, having made a deal with Obama, benevolently offer Hillary a full pardon due to her declining health, or some other issue, while referring her years of sacrifice in service to the public, her value as role model, etc.. . He will simply say, in the best interest of the public and America’s image, let’s just sweep this under the rug. And the public will agree.
Obama can pick the next president. All it takes is politics and he has loads of that
So there it is friends. My conspiracy theory of the moment. Hope you have a really great day
These are cute Twitter posts from IOWAHAWK, link on my webpage, in regards to President Obama’s visit to Cuba
A few moments of reality
I find it somewhat amusing, somewhat alarming, in the attacks being levied by both sides of the Cruz and Trump campaigns, not to mention the drive by media and government establishment cronies. Though reluctant to enter the fray, once again, I feel that someone needs to step up and ask/answer a few questions. Maybe provoke a little more thought into the decision-making process
First, I think either candidate is preferable to what is being offered from the other side. With both Hillary and Bernie promising trillions of new dollars in lavish new spending, based on the proven non productive policies of past and current thinking, the middle class will continue to slide into poverty. After all, a country that is not producing enough revenue to pays its’ bills, simply cannot survive by going even further in debt for little to no gain and no plan to change direction.
That being said, let us have a look at my ‘personal’ thoughts on the pluses and minuses of each candidate. First, let me try to add a bit of reality to the accusations of Lying Ted and Angry Donald.
After reviewing the accusations of Lying Ted I find it difficult to see them as anything more than what passes for political theater these days. The whole approach is designed to get a candidate off message and have them expend time and resources responding to accusations that are purposely taken out of context. It puts them on the defensive and prevents them from getting a positive message out.
Did Senator Cruz’s campaign issue a false report stating that Dr. Carson was stopping his campaign. Yes, but it was based on a news media report that mis-interpreted Dr. Carson when he stated that he was going home. He was going home to visit, not for good, but a reporter did put out a web story, later retracted, stating that Dr. Carson was suspending his campaign. So I give can give Lying Ted a pass on that one.
Senator Cruz’s campaign manager also made quite a few mis-steps on Ted’s behalf, which ultimately resorted to the campaign manager resigning.
Did Senator Cruz attempt to amend the Gang of Eight amnesty bill. Why yes, he did. But, his efforts where not in support of the bill. His efforts were a political attempt to expose the misleading elements of the bill. Supporters of the bill immediately balked at Ted’s amendments, even though the amendments clearly stated what the supporters of bill had previously said they would support. But, they didn’t really support it, because they balked and refused to support Senator Cruz’s efforts. Which is exactly why Senator Cruz sponsored the amendments in the first place. In order to expose the lies of others. This was pure politics. There is a reason that the term politics has become a four letter word. So I have to give Senator Cruz a pass on that one, he has been consistent in regards to immigration issues.
Angry Donald is one of many of the roles Mr. Trump’s plays. Mr. Trump knows how to play the media game. He is better at it than most, and it has saved him millions of dollars in advertising costs, as the media keeps him in the spotlight. Keeps him relevant. As for Angry Donald, there is also Conservative Donald, Liberal Donald, Compassionate Donald and Business Donald. There are probably a few more Donalds that were are not aware of. These are roles that Mr. Trump uses, and uses effectively, to his advantage. Who is the real Donald. Based on past history, a shrewd and capable business investor, fiscally conservative, but socially moderate, who does honestly believe that he necessary skills and knowledge in order to turn this country around financially.
As for the Violent David issue. When violence seems to follow certain people around, at some point, you have to realize that those people are probably the source of the problem. Violence has surrounded the protesters, whether protesting Trump, the color of the school flag, the fact that Barney is purple, etc… at every event they stage. Almost every venue that these, professionally paid, protesters show up at, ends in some type of violence or public disturbance. They purposely punish innocent people in order to get their message out. Be it blocking traffic, shutting down events, to full-scale burning and looting, I have to blame to the protesters, not Donald Trump or his supporters.
My pros for each candidate.
Mr. Trump is a capable businessman. He believes in this country. He has the knowledge and ability to make investments in the right areas. Investments that will provide industrial growth, jobs, increased revenues and overall financial health. He will support the military and provide adequate defense. He will negotiate fair treaties. He will control the borders.
Senator Cruz is capable statesman. A dependable, track record proven, conservative. He came to the senate and did what he promised he would do (rare for any politician these days) He will support the military and provide adequate defense. He will negotiate fair treaties. He will control the borders. He will appoint conservative justices.
My cons for each candidate.
Mr. Trump is a business man who believes in the art of the deal. He will wheel and deal. He will give things away to established government on both sides in order to get what he wants. What he will give away is what concerns me. How far will he go to make a deal?
Mr. Trump is also a risk taker. He has built and lost fortunes worth billions of dollars over his lifetime. What gambles is he willing to take with America’s future? He is also highly reactive, will he fully consider the ramifications of taking an action before taking the action? Will he reign in establishment government and get them back to supporting the people vice the billionaire social elites?
I also get the feeling that Mr. Trump would prefer moderate justices.
Senator Cruz is an attorney. Will he support tort reform? Tort reform would take much of the power away from the trial attorneys who suck the life out of our economy by filing one frivolous lawsuit after another realizing that most companies, right or wrong, will find it cheaper to settle out of court and avoid negative press. When companies pay out money, on frivolous lawsuits, the cost is passed on to the consumer and of course less company profit results in less company taxes paid. These actions results in losses to the economy, investments, employment, tax revenues, etc.. and increase the costs of everything we do. Very few people understand that every time you make a purchase, visit a doctor, see a show, you are paying for legal fees mostly generated by, or in defense of, frivolous lawsuits.
Will Senator Cruz be able to bring his party in line with the needs of the nation, or will his time in office simply be four years of war with establishment government and billionaire social elites? He and the senate majority leader have issues which need to be resolved. I have no doubt that Ted can work with he house, but the senate is another story.
As an aside, why is it that we send lawyers to Washington DC in order to write our laws. Lawyers do not write laws for the people. Lawyers write laws for Lawyers. In law school, lawyers are taught three basic principles. First, win, win at any cost. Second, get paid. Third, create as much work for other lawyers as possible. At the end of the day, lawyers only want to afford the public with ‘one right’. The right to hire a lawyer. Why else would they write simple laws, in direct violation of the rules for writing laws, using so many pages of legal double speak. Because, the intent is clear, if you want to understand, or be compensated, or gain the rights, under the law, you ‘must’ hire an attorney. Please stop sending attorneys to Washington DC. The government is full, we have ‘way’ too many now
Back to the issue at hand
So these are my thoughts. Both men are good candidates and both men come with the questions we would have for any candidate. If we could meld them into one candidate, Trump’s business sense combined with Cruz’s knowledge and statesmanship, the results would provide, I believe, the ideal candidate.
That being said, at this point in time, I tend to support the more conservative Cruz as he is more predicable. However, I will support either candidate in their run for the presidency. Hopefully, when the dust clears, we will end up with both men running as a team. If that not be the case, I believe there is room in any administration for the talents of both men.
Hope you have a great day
BTW: Know I will catch flak from all three sides on this one. I have to upgrade my body armor
My Sunday Devotional. I hope you enjoy.
This is a newer version of Dami Im singing ‘This Is My Desire’ with background music and vocals.
As promised. Here is Dami’s X Factor audition. This is not the beginning of the journey, nor is it the end. Please treat yourself to the journey available on youtube and other sites. I hope you enjoy it as much as I do